Is There Still a Place for Forceps Delivery in Modern Obstetrics?

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, we are witnessing a decrease of vaginal instrumental deliveries and continuous increase of caesarean section rate. However, proper identification of possibility of execution, indications for instrumental delivery and their skilful use may improve the broadly understood maternal and neonatal outcomes. The aim of this study is to present prevalence, risk factors, indications and outcomes of forceps deliveries among the patients at Department of Perinatology, Lodz. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Perinatology, Medical University of Lodz. The study included forceps deliveries carried out between January 2019 and December 2022. Total number of 147 cases were analysed in terms of indications for forceps delivery and maternal and neonatal outcomes such as vaginal - or cervical - laceration, postpartum haemorrhage, perineal tear, newborn injuries, Apgar score, umbilical cord blood gas analysis, NICU admission and cranial ultrasound scans. RESULTS: The prevalence of forceps delivery was 2.2%. The most common indication for forceps delivery was foetal distress (81.6%). Among mothers, the most frequent complication was vaginal laceration (40.1%). Third-and fourth-degree perineal tears were not noted. Regarding neonatal outcomes, Apgar score ≥ 8 after 1st and 5th minute of life received accordingly 91.2% and 98% of newborns. Only 8.8% experienced severe birth injuries (subperiosteal haematoma, clavicle fracture). CONCLUSIONS: Although foetal distress is the most common indication for forceps delivery, the vast majority of newborns were born in good condition and did not require admission to NICU. Taking into consideration high efficacy and low risk of neonatal and maternal complications, forceps should remain in modern obstetrics.

Severe neonatal birth injury: Observational study of associations with operative, cesarean, and spontaneous vaginal delivery.

AIM: To determine the association of successful and unsuccessful operative vaginal delivery attempts with risk of severe neonatal birth injury. METHODS: We conducted a population-based observational study of 1 080 503 births between 2006 and 2019 in Quebec, Canada. The main exposure was operative vaginal delivery with forceps or vacuum, elective or emergency cesarean with or without an operative vaginal attempt, and spontaneous delivery. The outcome was severe birth injury, including intracranial hemorrhage, brain and spinal damage, Erb's paralysis and other brachial plexus injuries, epicranial subaponeurotic hemorrhage, skull and long bone fractures, and liver, spleen, and other neonatal body injuries. We determined the association of delivery mode with risk of severe birth injury using adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 8194 infants (0.8%) had severe birth injuries. Compared with spontaneous delivery, vacuum (RR 2.98, 95% CI 2.80-3.16) and forceps (RR 3.35, 95% CI 3.07-3.66) were both associated with risk of severe injury. Forceps was associated with intracranial hemorrhage (RR 16.4, 95% CI 10.1-26.6) and brain and spinal damage (RR 13.5, 95% CI 5.72-32.0), while vacuum was associated with epicranial subaponeurotic hemorrhage (RR 27.5, 95% CI 20.8-36.4) and skull fractures (RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.86-2.25). Emergency cesarean after an unsuccessful operative attempt was associated with intracranial and epicranial subaponeurotic hemorrhage, but elective and other emergency cesareans were not associated with severe injury. CONCLUSIONS: Operative vaginal delivery and unsuccessful operative attempts that result in an emergency cesarean are associated with elevated risks of severe birth injury.

A prospective study on neonatal ophthalmic injuries associated with forceps delivery.

BACKGROUND: Assisted delivery by forceps is needed to expedite vaginal delivery in certain maternal and fetal conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and the extent of ophthalmological injuries in neonates after forceps delivery. METHODS: Women with cephalic fetuses delivered vaginally by forceps from July 2020 to June 2022 were recruited prospectively. Ophthalmologists would be consulted when there were signs of external ophthalmic injuries, such as periorbital forceps marks or facial bruising. Demographic data, pregnancy characteristics, delivery details, and perinatal outcomes were evaluated to identify any associated risk factors for neonatal ophthalmological injuries. RESULTS: A total of 77 forceps deliveries were performed in the study period, in which 20 cases (26%) required ophthalmological consultations. There were more right or left occipital fetal head positions in the group requiring ophthalmological assessment than those that did not require assessment (35% vs 12.3% [P = 0.023]). The degree of moulding of the fetal head was more marked in the former group (65% vs 28% [P = 0.001]). The overall incidence of detectable ophthalmological lesions was 16.9% (13/77). All ophthalmic injuries were mild, and most resolved with conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, external ophthalmic injuries were common after forceps delivery. We recommended ophthalmological consultation in newborns delivered by forceps with evidence of compressive trauma to rule out serious ophthalmological trauma.

Parto vaginal operatório / Operative vaginal delivery

PONTOS-CHAVE Quando utilizados na técnica correta, fórcipes e vácuo-extratores apresentam baixos índices de complicações. Para o feto com sinais de hipóxia no período expulsivo, o parto vaginal operatório tem potencial para reduzir a exposição aos fatores intraparto que promovem a encefalopatia hipóxico-isquêmica. Fórcipes médios e/ou rotacionais são opções apropriadas em circunstâncias selecionadas e exigem habilidade e experiência. Os fórcipes são mais resolutivos do que os vácuo-extratores para o parto vaginal operatório, porém são mais associados a lacerações perineais graves. Céfalo-hematoma é mais provável de ocorrer com o aumento na duração da vácuo-extração. Os vácuo-extratores de campânulas flexíveis apresentam taxas maiores de falha, porém apresentam menores incidências de trauma no couro cabeludo do neonato. (AU)

Clinical and Physician Factors Associated With Failed Operative Vaginal Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To examine clinical and physician factors associated with failed operative vaginal delivery among individuals with nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex (NTSV) births. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with NTSV live births with an attempted operative vaginal delivery by a physician between 2016 and 2020 in California. The primary outcome was cesarean birth after failed operative vaginal delivery, identified using linked diagnosis codes, birth certificates, and physician licensing board data stratified by device type (vacuum or forceps). Clinical and physician-level exposures were selected a priori, defined using validated indices, and compared between successful and failed operative vaginal delivery attempts. Physician experience with operative vaginal delivery was estimated by calculating the number of operative vaginal delivery attempts made per physician during the study period. Multivariable mixed effects Poisson regression models with robust standard errors were used to estimate risk ratios of failed operative vaginal delivery for each exposure, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 47,973 eligible operative vaginal delivery attempts, 93.2% used vacuum and 6.8% used forceps. Of all operative vaginal delivery attempts, 1,820 (3.8%) failed; the success rate was 97.3% for vacuum attempts and 82.4% for forceps attempts. Failed operative vaginal deliveries were more likely with older patient age, higher body mass index, obstructed labor, and neonatal birth weight more than 4,000 g. Between 2016 and 2020, physicians who attempted more operative vaginal deliveries were less likely to fail. When vacuum attempts were successful, physicians who conducted them had a median of 45 vacuum attempts during the study period, compared with 27 attempts when vacuum attempts were unsuccessful (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.96). When forceps attempts were successful, physicians who conducted them had a median of 19 forceps attempts, compared with 11 attempts when forceps attempts were unsuccessful (aRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.91). CONCLUSION: In this large, contemporary cohort with NTSV births, several clinical factors were associated with operative vaginal delivery failure. Physician experience was associated with operative vaginal delivery success, more notably for forceps attempts. These results may provide guidance for physician training in maintenance of operative vaginal delivery skills.

Corneal higher-order aberrations in corneal endothelial decompensation secondary to obstetric forceps injury.

Forceps corneal injuries during infant delivery cause Descemet membrane (DM) breaks, that cause corneal astigmatism and corneal endothelial decompensation. The aim of this study is to characterise corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and corneal topographic patterns in corneal endothelial decompensation due to obstetric forceps injury. This retrospective study included 23 eyes of 21 patients (54.0 ± 9.0 years old) with forceps corneal injury, and 18 healthy controls. HOAs and coma aberrations were significantly larger in forceps injury (1.05 [0.76-1.98] µm, and 0.83 [0.58-1.69], respectively) than in healthy controls (0.10 [0.08-0.11], and 0.06 [0.05-0.07], respectively, both P < 0.0001). Patient visual acuity was positively correlated with coma aberration (rs = 0.482, P = 0.023). The most common topographic patterns were those of protrusion and regular astigmatism (both, six eyes, 26.1%), followed by asymmetric (five eyes, 21.7%), and flattening (four eyes, 17.4%). These results indicate that increased corneal HOAs are associated with decreased visual acuity in corneal endothelial decompensation with DM breaks and corneal topography exhibits various patterns in forceps injury.

Maternal and neonatal complications following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence regarding the safety of Kielland's rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) in comparison with other modes of delivery for the management of persistent fetal malposition in the second stage of labour. OBJECTIVES: To derive estimates of risks of maternal and neonatal complications following KRFD, compared with rotational ventouse delivery (RVD), non-rotational forceps delivery (NRFD) or a second-stage caesarean section (CS), from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. SEARCH STRATEGY: Standard search methodology, as recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Case series, prospective or retrospective cohort studies and population-based studies. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to derive weighted pooled estimates of maternal and neonatal complications. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. For postpartum haemorrhage there was no significant difference between Kielland's and ventouse delivery; the rate was lower in Kielland's delivery compared with non-rotational forceps (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95) and second-stage CS (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36-0.58). There were no differences in the rates of anal sphincter injuries or admission to neonatal intensive care. Rates of shoulder dystocia were higher with Kielland's delivery compared with ventouse delivery (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.08-2.98), but rates of neonatal birth trauma were lower (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.91). There were no differences seen in the rates of 5-min APGAR score < 7 between Kielland's delivery and other instrumental births, but they were lower when compared with second-stage CS (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Kielland's rotational forceps delivery is a safe option for the management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labour.

Operative vaginal delivery: practice patterns and outcomes at a tertiary general hospital.

Introduction: There has been a global decrease in operative vaginal deliveries, with a marked shift towards the vacuum extractor. However, little is known about the trends in operative vaginal delivery in Singapore. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on all operative vaginal deliveries performed from 2012 to 2017 at Singapore General Hospital (SGH). Maternal outcomes in terms of postpartum haemorrhage and obstetric anal sphincter injuries were compared between forceps- and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Neonatal outcomes in terms of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and clinically significant neonatal events were compared. The instrument preference of obstetricians was analysed. Results: A total of 906 consecutive operative vaginal deliveries were included in the study, comprising 461 forceps- and 445 vacuum-assisted deliveries. The rate of operative vaginal delivery was maintained at approximately 10% from 2012 to 2017. Neonatal cephalohematomas were more common after vacuum-assisted deliveries. Other maternal and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Clinically significant neonatal events were mostly due to shoulder dystocia, whereas all cases of NICU admissions were not directly related to the mode of delivery. Obstetricians' choice of instrument appeared to reflect personal preference and was not affected by the year of graduation. Conclusion: The rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity were low at SGH. Overall instrument use of forceps and vacuum was balanced, and proficiency in both was demonstrated by all operators. Operative vaginal delivery remains an essential skill in facilitating safe vaginal delivery, which should be maintained to keep Caesarean section rates in check.

"Assisted vaginal birth using the Paily obstetric forceps vs Ventouse - A randomized clinical trial".

OBJECTIVE: Instruments used in assisted vaginal birth have seen little innovation for decades. Due to the risk of trauma and technical difficulty incurred during forceps delivery, instrumental deliveries are on a decline, and the global rate of primary cesarean birth is rising. The novel Paily Obstetric Forceps (POF) features a compact, lighter design with thinner blades, designed to increase operator comfort and minimize maternal and neonatal injuries. We aim to determine the feasibility and safety of POF in achieving vaginal birth compared to a ventouse device with a 50 mm silastic cup. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-blinded, parallel arm, randomized clinical trial of the novel POF vs a ventouse device, in patients undergoing indicated assisted vaginal birth, at a tertiary care obstetric unit. We randomized 100 patients to be allocated on a 1:1 ratio to both intervention arms. Primary outcome was the proportion of successful instrumental deliveries. Secondary outcomes were the number of pulls required during traction and any maternal or neonatal adverse events. RESULTS: The POF was significantly more successful in achieving vaginal birth than the ventouse device (n = 50/50, 100 % vs n = 42/50, 84 %, p = 0.006). Operators reported requiring significantly fewer pulls during POF traction than ventouse. POF demonstrated a higher risk for maternal trauma (RR = 3.2, 95 % CI = 1.5 to 6.9, NNH = 2.7) but a lower risk for neonatal injury (RR = 0.6, 95 % CI = 0.3 to 1, NNH = 5.7). Maternal and neonatal recovery durations were comparable. There were no incidences of maternal or neonatal mortality. CONCLUSION: The POF can be used in indicated assisted vaginal birth with superior success rates and better neonatal outcomes than ventouse. Other obstetric forceps must be standardized to conduct larger superiority trials of forceps designs.

Operative vaginal delivery: practice patterns and outcomes at a tertiary general hospital

INTRODUCTION@#There has been a global decrease in operative vaginal deliveries, with a marked shift towards the vacuum extractor. However, little is known about the trends in operative vaginal delivery in Singapore.@*METHODS@#A retrospective study was conducted on all operative vaginal deliveries performed from 2012 to 2017 at Singapore General Hospital (SGH). Maternal outcomes in terms of postpartum haemorrhage and obstetric anal sphincter injuries were compared between forceps- and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Neonatal outcomes in terms of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission and clinically significant neonatal events were compared. The instrument preference of obstetricians was analysed.@*RESULTS@#A total of 906 consecutive operative vaginal deliveries were included in the study, comprising 461 forceps- and 445 vacuum-assisted deliveries. The rate of operative vaginal delivery was maintained at approximately 10% from 2012 to 2017. Neonatal cephalohematomas were more common after vacuum-assisted deliveries. Other maternal and neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Clinically significant neonatal events were mostly due to shoulder dystocia, whereas all cases of NICU admissions were not directly related to the mode of delivery. Obstetricians' choice of instrument appeared to reflect personal preference and was not affected by the year of graduation.@*CONCLUSION@#The rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity were low at SGH. Overall instrument use of forceps and vacuum was balanced, and proficiency in both was demonstrated by all operators. Operative vaginal delivery remains an essential skill in facilitating safe vaginal delivery, which should be maintained to keep Caesarean section rates in check.

Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After Attempted Operative Vaginal Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess severe short-term maternal and neonatal morbidity and pelvic floor disorders at 6 months postpartum after attempted operative vaginal delivery according to the instrument used. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of women with live, singleton, term fetuses in vertex presentation. Patients attempted operative vaginal delivery in a French tertiary care university hospital from December 2008 through October 2013. We used multivariable logistic regression and propensity score methods to control for indication bias and compare outcomes associated with vacuum-assisted or forceps- or spatula-assisted delivery. Severe maternal and neonatal morbidity were composite primary endpoints. Symptoms of urinary incontinence (UI) and anal incontinence (AI) were assessed 6 months after delivery by validated self-administered questionnaires. RESULTS: Among 2,128 attempted operative vaginal deliveries, 30.7% (n=654) used vacuum and 69.3% (n=1,474) used forceps or spatulas. Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 5.4% (n=35; 95% CI 3.8-7.4) of vacuum attempts and 10.5% (n=154; 95% CI 8.3-12.1) of forceps or spatula attempts (P<.001); severe neonatal morbidity occurred in 8.4% (n=55; 95% CI 6.4-10.8) and 10.2% (n=155; 95% CI 8.7-11.8), respectively (P=.2). Although attempted operative vaginal deliveries with forceps or spatula were significantly associated with more frequent severe maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.99 95% CI 1.27-3.10) in the multivariable logistic regression analysis, this association was no longer significant after propensity score matching (aOR 1.46 95% CI 0.72-2.95). Attempted operative vaginal deliveries with forceps or spatula were not significantly associated with more frequent severe neonatal morbidity after multivariable logistic regression or propensity score matching. Among the 934 women (43.9%) who responded to questionnaires at 6 months, the prevalence of symptoms of UI and AI were 22.7% and 22.0%, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: In singleton term pregnancies, neither severe short-term maternal or neonatal morbidity nor UI or AI were more frequent after attempted operative vaginal delivery by forceps or spatulas than by vacuum after controlling for indication bias with a propensity score analysis.

Maternal and neonatal morbidity after forceps or spatulas-assisted delivery in preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess perinatal morbidity associated with spatulas or forceps assisted delivery in preterm birth. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study including all women with assisted deliveries on singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, before 37 weeks of gestation, in two tertiary care centers. We compared forceps-assisted deliveries with spatula-assisted deliveries. The main outcome was the rate of neonatal birth trauma. Secondary outcomes included other neonatal parameters, maternal outcomes and obstetric anal sphincter injuries. RESULTS: Out of 37 002 deliveries, 59 (0.2 %) preterm assisted deliveries with forceps and 111 (0.3%) preterm spatulas deliveries were included. The rate of neonatal birth trauma was low for both devices, without significant difference (3.4% in Forceps group vs 0.9% in Spatulas group, p = 0.28). The rate of episiotomy was 79.7% after forceps-assisted delivery and 48.6% for spatulas (p < 0.001). The rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries was 1.7% and 2.7% respectively (p = 0,9). CONCLUSION: The rate of birth trauma was low in both forceps-assisted deliveries and spatula-assisted deliveries and was not significantly different between the two groups.

Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery.

BACKGROUND: Operative vaginal delivery (OVD) is considered safe if carried out by trained personnel. However, opportunities for training in OVD have declined and, given these shifts in practice, the safety of OVD is unknown. We estimated incidence rates of trauma following OVD in Canada, and quantified variation in trauma rates by instrument, region, level of obstetric care and institutional OVD volume. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of all singleton, term deliveries in Canada between April 2013 and March 2019, excluding Quebec. Our main outcome measures were maternal trauma (e.g., obstetric anal sphincter injury, high vaginal lacerations) and neonatal trauma (e.g., subgaleal hemorrhage, brachial plexus injury). We calculated adjusted and stabilized rates of trauma using mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 1 326 191 deliveries, 38 500 (2.9%) were attempted forceps deliveries and 110 987 (8.4%) were attempted vacuum deliveries. The maternal trauma rate following forceps delivery was 25.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.8%-25.7%) and the neonatal trauma rate was 9.6 (95% CI 8.6-10.6) per 1000 live births. Maternal and neonatal trauma rates following vacuum delivery were 13.2% (95% CI 13.0%-13.4%) and 9.6 (95% CI 9.0-10.2) per 1000 live births, respectively. Maternal trauma rates remained higher with forceps than with vacuum after adjustment for confounders (adjusted rate ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.65-1.75) and varied by region, but not by level of obstetric care. INTERPRETATION: In Canada, rates of trauma following OVD are higher than previously reported, irrespective of region, level of obstetric care and volume of OVD among hospitals. These results support a reassessment of OVD safety in Canada.

Effect of perineum protection cooperated by two operators in the forceps-assisted vaginal delivery: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of unique skill of perineum protection in forceps delivery on the maternal and neonatal morbidity. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted. Singleton pregnancies with forceps-assisted and normal vaginal deliveries were recruited. The maternal and neonatal complications were compared between forceps and normal deliveries. RESULTS: Five hundred forty participants were included. The prevalence of maternal anal sphincter injury, postpartum hemorrhage, vaginal hematoma, cervical laceration, perineal wound infection, perineal wound dehiscence, dyspareunia, urinary incontinence, and anal incontinence were not significantly different between forceps and normal deliveries (p > .05). However, the rate of neonatal facial injury was higher in the forceps group (2.9% versus 0, p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Cooperation according to the tension of perineum and labor process between obstetrician and midwife is important for perineum protection. Forceps-assisted delivery concentrating on perineum protection is an effective alternative in decreasing maternal morbidity.

Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps.

We compared complications in pregnancies that had Kielland's rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) with non-rotational forceps delivery (NRFD). Maternal outcomes included post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS); neonatal outcomes included admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 5-minute Apgar scores <7, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), jaundice, shoulder dystocia and birth trauma. The study population included 491 (2.1%) requiring KRFD, 1,257 (5.3%) requiring NRFD and 22,111 (93.0%) that had SVD. In pregnancies with NRFD compared to KRFD, there was higher incidence of OASIS (8.5% vs. 4.7%; p = .006) and a non-significant increased trend for PPH (15.0% vs. 12.4%; p = .173). There was no significant difference in rates of admission to NICU (p = .628), 5-minute Apgar score <7 (p = .375), HIE (p = .532), jaundice (p = .809), severe shoulder dystocia (p = .507) or birth trauma (p = .514). Our study demonstrates that KRFD has lower rates of maternal complications compared to NRFD whilst the rates of neonatal complications are similar.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Kielland's rotational forceps is used for achieving vaginal delivery in pregnancies with failure to progress in second stage of labour secondary to fetal malposition. The use of Kielland's forceps has significantly declined in the last few decades due to concerns about an increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications, despite the absence of any major studies demonstrating this increased risk.What do the results of this study add? There are some studies which compare the risks in pregnancies delivering by Kiellands forceps with rotational ventouse deliveries but there is limited evidence comparing the risks of rotational with non-rotational forceps deliveries. Our study compares the major maternal and neonatal complications in a large cohort of pregnancies undergoing rotational vs. non-rotational forceps deliveries.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The results of our study demonstrate that maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies delivering by Kielland's rotational forceps undertaken by appropriately trained obstetricians are either lower or similar to those delivering by non-rotational forceps. Consideration should be given to ensure that there is appropriate training provided to obstetricians to acquire skills in using Kielland's forceps.

Obstetrical forceps-induced Descemet membrane tears.

Obstetrical forceps-induced Descemet membrane tears (FIDMT) are usually encountered during complicated forceps-assisted deliveries. The condition may lead to significant visual debilitation in young children and is frequently ignored due to its low incidence. Undue stretch on the Descemet's membrane during the process of forceps-assisted delivery results in their vertical/oblique tear (s), which usually leads to corneal edema in early neonatal life. On its resolution, these residual tears result in visually disabling astigmatism that can lead to dense and recalcitrant amblyopia. Slit-lamp examination, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, confocal microscopy, and corneal topography and tomography can be employed for its accurate diagnosis. While these can be prevented by improved perinatal care, once diagnosed, they mandate prompt refractive correction and amblyopia therapy to prevent disabling visual deterioration in affected children. In adulthood, medical and surgical management may be planned for symptomatic patients based on coexistent amblyopia as this is the major factor guiding visual prognosis. There is limited comprehensive literature in this regard, and the present review discusses the pathogenesis, clinical features, and recent developments in investigations, management, and outcomes of FIDMT during the last three decades.

Risk analysis of poor wound healing in forceps delivery.

AIM: This study aims to explore the risk factors leading to poor wound healing after forceps delivery. METHOD: In this retrospective study, 74 patients undergoing forceps delivery with poor wound healing were compared with contemporary randomly selected 74 patients undergoing forceps delivery but with normal wound healing. RESULTS: Compared to the normal healing group, the poor healing group had larger birthweight (p = 0.01), longer labor length (805.9 ± 356.4 min vs. 572.9 ± 306.3 min, p < 0.001), more virginal checks (4.0 ± 1.5 vs. 3.4 ± 1.7, p = 0.029), and more contaminated amniotic fluid (p = 0.043). More patients in poor healing group suffered from postpartum fever (52.7% vs. 21.6%, p < 0.001), postpartum hemorrhage (p < 0.001), and anemia after delivery (p < 0.001). Labor length (odds ratio (OR) 1.125, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.033-1.226), anemia after delivery (OR 3.621, 95% CI = 2.077-6.314), postpartum fever (OR 7.100, 95% CI = 2.505-20.124), and degree of laceration (OR 3.067, 95% CI = 1.258-7.479) were the risk factors of poor healing of perineal wound after forceps delivery, while postpartum antibiotics (OR 0.303, 95% CI = 0.098-0.937) and suture removal days (OR 0.272, 95% CI = 0.133-0.556) were the protective factors. CONCLUSION: To promote the wound healing from the forceps delivery, obstetricians may consider to control the patient's labor length and degree of laceration, increase patient's nutrition, apply prophylactic antibiotics, and prolong the suture removal days.